HOODIE launched on Robinhood Chain on July 8, 2026 and quickly became one of the network’s most visible community tokens. Its identity comes from the hooded character used by developer HOODIE JAKE, whose online work already included QR COIN, Base Colors and Kondo. The token therefore arrived with a recognizable creator persona rather than an anonymous logo assembled for a launch.
The project has also produced more than a chart and a Telegram group. Its website includes a live tracker, meme library, merchandise links, community builds and Hoodie Hustle, a playable browser game. Those additions give the brand more surface area than the average copy-and-launch meme coin, although none currently creates strong recurring demand for the token itself.
HOODIE has more identity and visible building activity than most new-chain meme coins. Its investment case still depends on liquidity, attention and early-holder behavior. The creator allocation begins vesting after a short cliff, while the main pool has not faced a prolonged loss of interest.
HOODIE At A Glance
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Project | HOODIE |
| Ticker | HOODIE |
| Network | Robinhood Chain |
| Token Standard | ERC-20 through the DopplerERC20V1 implementation |
| Contract | 0xC72c01AAB5f5678dc1d6f5C6d2B417d91D402Ba3 |
| Launch Date | July 8, 2026 |
| Total Supply | 100,000,000,000 HOODIE |
| Initial Pool Allocation | 85% of supply |
| Creator Vesting Allocation | 15% over two years with a 30-day cliff |
| Primary Market | HOODIE/WETH through a Bankr/Doppler Uniswap V4 pool |
| Main Developer | HOODIE JAKE / @0FJAKE |
| Project Type | Creator-led community meme coin |
| Products | Token website, Meme Depot, merchandise, community builds and Hoodie Hustle |
| Token Utility | Limited |
| Risk Level | Very High |
| Editorial Score | 6.3/10 |
Market snapshot captured July 13, 2026:
| Metric | Snapshot |
|---|---|
| Price | Approximately $0.0000235 |
| Fully Diluted Valuation | Approximately $2.35 million |
| Estimated Circulating Value | Approximately $2.0 million based on the 85 billion tokens outside the creator vest |
| Main-Pool Liquidity | Approximately $560,100 |
| 24-Hour Volume | Approximately $914,700 |
| 24-Hour Transactions | 5,378 |
| Buys / Sells | 2,070 / 3,308 |
| Indexed Holders | Approximately 3,650, with explorer counts still inconsistent |
| Top 10 Visible Non-Infrastructure Wallets | Approximately 14.08% combined |
| Pool Age | Four days |
HOODIE moved between valuations near $1.6 million and $2.4 million during the same review window, which is normal for a token with a short history and concentrated activity in one primary market.
What Is HOODIE?
HOODIE trades on Robinhood Chain, an Ethereum Layer 2 built around tokenized assets, financial applications and permissionless onchain activity. The token appeared one week after the network’s public mainnet launch, when traders were still searching for recognizable community assets around the new ecosystem.
The hooded mascot was already connected to HOODIE JAKE’s online identity. That gave the launch a coherent visual language from the start: a green hood, a trader-like silhouette and a creator whose previous work could be inspected. Community members quickly adapted the image into avatars and memes.
There is no conventional protocol behind the token. HOODIE does not secure the chain, govern an application, distribute protocol revenue or unlock a financial product. Its value comes from the creator’s visibility, community participation, brand activity and the market’s willingness to keep trading the character.
How HOODIE Launched
HOODIE began with a public X request directing Bankr to launch the token on Robinhood Chain. Bankr deployed it through Doppler, creating a fixed-supply ERC-20 and a Uniswap V4 market without a conventional presale or private fundraising round.
The launch mechanics are more specific than a generic “fair launch” claim. The contract created 100 billion HOODIE. Eighty-five billion tokens seeded the liquidity pool, while 15 billion were reserved for the fee recipient under a two-year vesting schedule with a 30-day cliff. The creator allocation remains locked during the cliff and then begins vesting continuously until the two-year period ends.
Bankr launches also start with a temporary anti-snipe fee that decays over roughly ten seconds. Early transactions inside that window can pay far more than the normal pool fee. Once the launch phase ends, the Uniswap V4 pool carries a 0.7% creator fee, split 95% to the fee recipient and 5% to Doppler, plus Bankr’s separate platform fee.
This structure removes future minting and avoids an immediately liquid creator allocation. It does not eliminate sell pressure. The 15% vest begins unlocking after 30 days, and the fee recipient also receives most creator-fee revenue from trading. The beneficiary and any connected wallets should remain part of the project’s ongoing transparency checks.
Who Is HOODIE JAKE?
HOODIE JAKE, known online as @0FJAKE, has a visible history of building small onchain products. QR COIN runs an attention auction that lets a daily winner direct traffic toward a chosen link. Base Colors and Kondo add further evidence that the creator was active before HOODIE appeared.
This history gives HOODIE an advantage over tokens run by empty launch wallets. Jake continues to publish, maintain the website and attach his public persona to the brand.
The setup is still creator-dependent. HOODIE does not disclose a company, treasury committee, multisignature governance structure or formal operating team. The project’s direction and much of its social reach remain tied to one online identity. A visible builder is easier to evaluate than an anonymous deployer, but the token still lacks the institutional continuity of a project with distributed control.
Why HOODIE Gained Attention
HOODIE entered a market already primed by Robinhood Chain’s first major meme coin. Traders had seen that a community token could attract substantial turnover on the new network, making them quicker to search for other identities with a clear story.
HOODIE benefited from timing and recognizable authorship. The name is short, the mascot is easy to adapt and the creator already used the character. Community members could participate immediately by changing avatars, publishing memes or building small tools around the visual identity.
Price momentum added reach, but the trading pattern remains uneven. At the July 13 snapshot, sells outnumbered buys by roughly 60%, even as the token traded above its earliest valuation. High turnover shows that HOODIE is actively traded. It does not show whether ownership is becoming more stable or simply changing hands rapidly among short-term wallets.
The HOODIE Brand And Community Builds
The main website is polished for a token created only days earlier. It displays the contract, Uniswap route, market tracker, project history, developer information and links to community activity. The page is direct about the token’s independent status and does not manufacture a protocol roadmap.
The Meme Depot contained around 70 images and GIFs during the review. The reusable library gives the community more material than a few launch graphics, although its durability will only become clear after the initial attention fades.
Physical merchandise extends the brand but does not currently create token utility. The store prices its hoodie in ordinary currency through a third-party storefront. HOODIE is not required for checkout, and no visible token burn or revenue-sharing mechanism connects merchandise sales to holders.
Independent community builds are a stronger social signal than merchandise. Avatar tools, dashboards and galleries show that participants are willing to spend time on the brand without waiting for a formal roadmap. They still need to be separated from official products because quality, security and maintenance can vary between builders.
Hoodie Hustle Review
Hoodie Hustle is a small browser game embedded in the project website. Players move the mascot across the screen, collect green candles, avoid rugs and face a boss every fifth level. Collected bags can be spent on permanent upgrades inside the game.
The game works as a brand extension rather than a token product. The interface does not require a wallet connection, and the displayed “HOODIE bags” behave as an in-game score and upgrade balance. No onchain reward, token transfer or verifiable token sink was present during the review.
The game gives the community something to share beyond chart screenshots, but it should not count as token utility until actual HOODIE is required, earned, spent or burned through verifiable transactions.
Does HOODIE Have Utility?
HOODIE has cultural utility. It acts as a shared mascot, avatar and membership signal for a small community forming around Robinhood Chain. Memes, merchandise, the game and independent tools reinforce that identity.
Product engagement is also visible. Visitors can browse media, play Hoodie Hustle and follow live market activity. Those products improve the brand but remain accessible without holding the token.
Token utility is limited. HOODIE is not required for access, payments, game upgrades, rewards, governance, staking or revenue sharing. Trading fees benefit the launch fee recipient rather than creating an automatic holder distribution. The ecosystem can keep people interested, but it does not yet create recurring demand that exists independently of speculation.
HOODIE Tokenomics And Supply
HOODIE’s market cap, circulating supply and FDV need to be separated because the standard tracker display can treat the full 100 billion supply as circulating even while 15 billion tokens remain inside the creator vest.
The fixed maximum supply is 100 billion. Bankr’s Doppler template does not allow additional minting after deployment. Eighty-five billion tokens were allocated to the market, while 15 billion were preminted into the vesting structure for the fee recipient. No separate public treasury or governance allocation has been identified.
| Supply Question | Verified Finding |
|---|---|
| Total Supply | 100 billion HOODIE |
| Initial Tradable Allocation | 85 billion HOODIE |
| Creator Vesting | 15 billion HOODIE over two years with a 30-day cliff |
| Additional Minting | Not available under the fixed-supply DopplerERC20V1 template |
| Burned Supply | No material verified burn identified |
| Vesting Recipient | Fixed at launch to the fee recipient; not clearly identified on the project website |
| Public Treasury | None disclosed |
| Top 10 Non-Infrastructure Share | Approximately 14.08% at the review snapshot |
| Largest Visible Non-Infrastructure Wallet | Approximately 2.21% |
| Initial Liquidity Allocation | 85% seeded into the Bankr/Doppler Uniswap V4 pool |
The vesting schedule delays creator selling, but the first unlocks begin 30 days after launch. Fifteen percent of supply remains large relative to a market with liquidity measured in hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Smart Contract Review
The verified contract address is 0xC72c01AAB5f5678dc1d6f5C6d2B417d91D402Ba3.
The token uses Bankr’s DopplerERC20V1 implementation. Its supply is fixed at deployment, which removes an unrestricted future-minting risk. The standard token template does not expose the usual adjustable buy tax, sell tax, blacklist, maximum-wallet or maximum-transaction controls found in heavily administered meme tokens.
The launch system still contains more moving parts than a bare ERC-20. Creator vesting, fee claims and the Uniswap V4 pool depend on Bankr and Doppler contracts. The fee recipient has economic rights to the creator allocation and most of the 0.7% creator fee. Those rights are material even when the token contract itself cannot mint more supply.
Traditional “LP burned” language does not fit this setup. The primary market uses Uniswap V4 and Doppler infrastructure rather than a simple pair that issues transferable LP tokens to the creator. The PoolManager held about 12.54% of HOODIE at the snapshot, while the main pool itself held 14.21 billion tokens. Withdrawal and position controls should be judged through the launch infrastructure, not a burn-address screenshot.
Contract permissions, liquidity control and concentrated wallets still belong beside repeating rug-pull patterns. HOODIE scores above an opaque custom contract because the supply and launch model are standardized. It does not receive a top security score because the fee beneficiary, vesting rights and liquidity-position control remain important trust points.
HOODIE Markets, Volume And Liquidity
The primary HOODIE/WETH pool held approximately 14.21 billion HOODIE and 129.42 WETH at the review snapshot. The combined position was worth around $560,100, representing almost 24% of the token’s $2.35 million fully diluted valuation. Two smaller Uniswap V4 pools paired HOODIE with USDG and WETH, but the main Bankr pool dominated volume and usable liquidity.
Daily volume of roughly $914,700 exceeded the pool’s WETH side several times over, showing active turnover. It also reflected more sells than buys. Liquidity can absorb normal retail activity, but a large holder can still move the market because only about $230,000 of WETH sat on the quote side of the primary pool.
HOODIE’s displayed valuation means little without crypto liquidity, market depth and slippage data. The following estimates use the pool’s WETH reserve and a simple constant-product approximation. They exclude the 0.7% creator fee, Bankr’s additional platform fee, gas and route changes, so an executable quote can be worse.
| Swap Size | Approximate Reserve-Based Price Impact |
|---|---|
| $100 | About 0.04% before fees |
| $1,000 | About 0.43% before fees |
| $5,000 | About 2.13% before fees |
| $10,000 | About 4.17% before fees |
Actual Uniswap V4 execution depends on active ranges, routing and current trading. A $10,000 order is small relative to FDV but meaningful beside the available WETH reserve.
Holder Distribution And Early-Wallet Risk
The raw holder table initially looks highly concentrated because the token contract holds 15% and the Uniswap V4 PoolManager holds around 12.54%. Those entries represent the vesting allocation and market infrastructure rather than two ordinary whales.
After excluding them, the ten largest visible wallets held approximately 14.08% combined. The largest visible non-infrastructure wallet held about 2.21%, followed by wallets near 1.95%, 1.58% and 1.55%. That distribution is healthier than the unfiltered leaderboard suggests, although wallet clustering has not been ruled out.
Holder trackers ranged from a little over 2,000 to roughly 3,650 addresses. Related wallets can also share funding sources or split one position across several addresses. The creator’s 15% vest sits outside the public-wallet concentration and will enter circulation after the cliff.
HOODIE does not show one obvious independent wallet controlling a double-digit share at the snapshot. Its larger risk is the combined effect of early buyers, the vesting allocation and a pool with limited quote-side capital.
HOODIE Price Performance
HOODIE’s trading history is too short to support a normal performance assessment. It launched on July 8, moved through several rapid valuation changes and recorded HOODIE’s first major breakout before the market had completed its first week.
The July 13 review window showed the token moving between valuations near $1.6 million and $2.4 million. Seven-day gains remained large because the starting valuation was extremely low, while intraday changes swung sharply in both directions. Volume expanded faster than holder indexing could stabilize.
HOODIE has not survived months of declining attention, low volume, creator vesting or a broad Robinhood Chain liquidity contraction. Early percentage returns are not a normal baseline.
How To Buy HOODIE More Safely
HOODIE trades primarily through a WETH pool on Robinhood Chain. A compatible wallet needs the network configured, enough ETH for gas and the asset used by the selected route. The full contract is:
0xC72c01AAB5f5678dc1d6f5C6d2B417d91D402Ba3
Search by contract rather than ticker. Confirm the network, pool, quote asset, estimated output, creator fee, platform fee and price impact before signing. Small test trades can expose routing or token-import mistakes before more capital is committed.
Copied HOODIE tickers can appear on other networks. A matching name, mascot or website design does not prove that a contract is the Robinhood Chain token reviewed here.
Main HOODIE Risks
Short operating history: HOODIE has existed for days, not market cycles. Its community, liquidity and developer activity have not been tested through prolonged inactivity.
Creator allocation: Fifteen percent of supply vests to the fee recipient over two years, with the cliff ending 30 days after launch. That allocation is transparent but economically significant.
Attention dependence: Current demand comes from the creator persona, memes and Robinhood Chain speculation. The token has no separate protocol demand.
Liquidity risk: The main pool is healthy for a very young token but small relative to the fully diluted valuation. Several large exits could move the price sharply.
Creator dependence: The website, mascot and project direction are strongly linked to HOODIE JAKE. Reduced involvement would weaken the brand.
Infrastructure risk: HOODIE relies on Bankr, Doppler and Uniswap V4 contracts for vesting, fees and market liquidity. A standard launch template reduces custom-code risk but adds dependencies.
Holder risk: Visible concentration appears moderate after removing infrastructure addresses, but related-wallet clustering and early cost bases remain difficult to measure.
Chain dependence: HOODIE’s attention is tied to Robinhood Chain’s opening market cycle. Lower activity across the network would reduce its natural audience and liquidity.
The same evidence-first process used when researching early altcoins is especially important here because almost every market signal is still based on less than one week of trading.
HOODIE Pros And Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Memorable visual identity tied to an established creator persona | Only days of operating and trading history |
| Visible developer with previous onchain projects | 15% creator vesting allocation begins unlocking after 30 days |
| Active website, meme library, merchandise and browser game | No functional demand for the token |
| Fixed supply with no post-deployment minting | High dependence on creator activity and social attention |
| Moderate visible holder concentration after infrastructure exclusions | Wallet clustering and fee-recipient identity remain incomplete |
| Meaningful liquidity relative to many new meme coins | Main market still has limited quote-side depth |
| Standardized Bankr/Doppler launch mechanics | Liquidity, fees and vesting depend on external launch infrastructure |
HOODIE Editorial Scorecard
| Category | Weight | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Branding And Narrative | 15% | 8.0/10 |
| Developer Visibility | 15% | 7.0/10 |
| Community Activity | 15% | 6.5/10 |
| Product And Build Activity | 10% | 6.0/10 |
| Tokenomics Transparency | 15% | 6.0/10 |
| Contract Safety | 10% | 6.5/10 |
| Liquidity And Market Quality | 10% | 5.5/10 |
| Holder Distribution | 5% | 6.0/10 |
| Token Utility | 5% | 2.5/10 |
| Final Score | 100% | 6.3/10 |
HOODIE Verdict
HOODIE has a stronger identity than most meme coins launched during a new-chain rush. The mascot existed before the token, the developer has a visible body of onchain work and the community has already produced memes, tools, merchandise and a playable game. Its market also has meaningful liquidity for a project less than one week old.
The weak points sit inside the token rather than the brand. HOODIE has no functional demand, its main market remains small enough for large exits to move price and the 15% creator allocation starts vesting after a 30-day cliff. The fee recipient also earns most creator fees, giving the project a clear creator economy without giving holders revenue rights.
HOODIE is more developed as a brand than many tokens launched during a new-chain meme cycle. Its creator history, community tools and recognizable identity give it a stronger foundation for retaining attention. They do not yet establish a durable investment case. HOODIE remains a very-high-risk meme coin whose future depends on transparent wallet behavior, stable liquidity and whether the community continues building after Robinhood Chain’s launch excitement fades.
HOODIE Frequently Asked Questions
What is HOODIE crypto?
HOODIE is a creator-led meme coin launched on Robinhood Chain on July 8, 2026. Its identity comes from the hooded persona used by developer HOODIE JAKE and a community built around memes, tools and small interactive products.
What is the official HOODIE contract address?
The reviewed contract is 0xC72c01AAB5f5678dc1d6f5C6d2B417d91D402Ba3. The full address and Robinhood Chain network should be verified before every trade.
Who created HOODIE?
HOODIE JAKE, known online as @0FJAKE, initiated the launch through Bankr. His previous public projects include QR COIN, Base Colors and Kondo. The project does not disclose a conventional company or formal team structure.
How many HOODIE tokens exist?
The fixed total supply is 100 billion HOODIE. Eighty-five billion tokens were allocated to the initial market, while 15 billion vest to the launch fee recipient over two years after a 30-day cliff.
Where can HOODIE be traded?
The main market is a HOODIE/WETH pool created through Bankr and Doppler on Uniswap V4. Smaller WETH and USDG pools also exist on Robinhood Chain.
Is HOODIE a good investment?
HOODIE has stronger branding and creator visibility than many new meme coins, but it remains very high risk. Its short history, creator allocation, limited token utility, volatile market and dependence on Robinhood Chain attention make a complete loss possible.
Be the first to comment