An anonymous crypto commentator is circulating what they describe as leaked Ripple documentation, arguing that the company’s long-term strategy is not to overthrow SWIFT, but to wire its technology directly into the existing global payments plumbing.
If genuine, the materials would undercut the popular narrative that Ripple aims to supplant legacy rails entirely and instead position XRP as a core settlement layer behind them.
Docs: Ripple To Connect With SWIFT, Not Kill It
The host focuses on three screenshots they say come “directly from Ripple.” In one, Ripple allegedly states that it “does not supplant conventional payment channels such as SWIFT but rather connects them.”
Sponsored
Crypto Prediction Markets
18+ · Gambling involves risk. Play responsibly.
Another line claims Ripple’s system, while having its own XRP currency, can execute transactions “in any currency.”
The materials describe Ripple as “actively integrat[ing] into the banking industry,” which the host links to recent headlines about collaborations involving Ripple, Mastercard and JPMorgan.
The video does not show independent confirmation of those specific partnership details, but uses them to argue that the documents track with how large financial institutions are experimenting with blockchain-based settlement today.
XRP Supply, RLUSD & The Deflation Argument
A central claim from the alleged leak is that “the total amount of the XRP currency will gradually decrease and its price will rise,” tied to network usage and XRP’s transaction-burning mechanism. Levi Rietveld extrapolates: if “trillions of dollars” someday move across the XRP Ledger, that burn could become material for supply.
He extends this to Ripple’s new stablecoin, RLUSD. Every RLUSD transaction on the XRP Ledger, they say, requires XRP as gas and burns a small amount, implying that growth in USD, EUR, GBP, CNY and other fiat stablecoins on XRPL could collectively accelerate XRP’s deflationary dynamic.
This is framed as a key link between stablecoin adoption and XRP’s long-term value, a question viewers frequently raise.
Patents, ISO 20022 & SWIFT’s Strategic Choices
The leaked material also highlights Ripple’s patented technology. One passage claims these patents “prevent competitors from using similar blockchain networks without their permission,” leading the host to argue that SWIFT “will not be able to” build an equally efficient ledger on its own and would instead need to integrate Ripple’s stack.
Diagrammed flows in the screenshots show banks on both sides of a transaction using “bidirectional messaging with settlement instructions” over Ripple, compared with SWIFT’s current one-way messaging, which requires separate review before settlement.
The surfaced documents tie this to ISO 20022 migration, suggesting Ripple can offer both rich messaging and real-time settlement while remaining compatible with existing standards.
Regulators such as the Federal Reserve, one excerpt notes, would “continue to set and enforce regulatory standards,” while messaging frameworks like SWIFT “can be easily integrated into Ripple.”
That division of labor — regulators set rules, SWIFT handles messaging, Ripple handles ledger and settlement — is presented as the intended end-state architecture.
Levi Rietveld concludes with a strongly bullish personal stance, saying they are buying “over 1,000 XRP every single day” and predicting that investors “sleeping on XRP” will regret it within “five to six months.”
These are opinions, not verifiable forecasts, but they underscore how the alleged documents are being interpreted in trading communities: as evidence that XRP could sit under, not outside, the future bank payments stack.
Delve into DailyCoin’s popular crypto news today:
Grayscale Rebrands Bitcoin Miners ETF Amid AI Computing Shift
Bitcoin Capitulation Is Cooling, But $69K Remains Key
People Also Ask:
The YouTube video episode presents them as “alleged” internal Ripple materials; no independent verification is shown.
According to the screenshots cited, Ripple’s stated goal is to connect to channels like SWIFT, not supplant them.
The host says every RLUSD transaction on XRPL uses XRP for gas and burns a small amount, potentially increasing XRP’s deflationary pressure if volumes scale.
The documents highlight bidirectional messaging and real-time settlement on a patented ledger, versus SWIFT’s one-way messaging that requires separate settlement steps.
DailyCoin’s Vibe Check: Which way are you leaning towards after reading this article?
Be the first to comment