SurancePlus raise was 95% Oxbridge-funded

Blockonomics
Paxful


Oxbridge Re Holdings supplied about 95% of the $781,767 raised by SurancePlus’s two T20 and T42 Solana-based placements. Those two offerings were part of the five placements behind Oxbridge’s broader $7.1 million headline, according to the company’s Aug. 13 filing.

SurancePlus, Oxbridge’s 80%-owned tokenized reinsurance subsidiary, offered the two products, T20 and T42. Oxbridge contributed approximately $744,623, while third-party investors supplied approximately $37,143. Using the reported total as the denominator, the split was about 95.25% parent-funded and 4.75% third-party-funded.

Infographic showing SurancePlus’s T20 and T42 placement raised $781,767, with Oxbridge supplying 95.25% and third parties 4.75%.Infographic showing SurancePlus’s T20 and T42 placement raised $781,767, with Oxbridge supplying 95.25% and third parties 4.75%.

Oxbridge consolidates controlled subsidiaries, including SurancePlus, so the parent-funded subscription came from inside the group rather than independent investors. The filing does not explain how the consolidated accounts eliminated that specific transaction.

okex

The $7.1 million aggregate in Oxbridge’s earnings release combined the T20 and T42 placements with three securities linked to HCI Group’s reinsurance business. Those HCI-linked series produced $6.323 million in gross subscription proceeds. Added to the T20 and T42 proceeds, the disclosed amounts total about $7.105 million, which rounds to the company’s headline figure.

Solana’s $8.7B RWA surge shows tokenized assets are finally starting to moveSolana’s $8.7B RWA surge shows tokenized assets are finally starting to move
Related Reading

Solana’s $8.7B RWA surge shows tokenized assets are finally starting to move

Solana’s RWA transfer volume more than doubled over 30 days, shifting the adoption signal from tokenized value to usage quality.

Jul 7, 2026 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo

The filing identifies the HCI-series purchasers only as “investors.” It does not name them or divide the proceeds between outside and related parties. The filings therefore do not support counting the $6.323 million as independently verified third-party demand, and they do not establish that HCI supplied the subscription proceeds.

Meanwhile, HCI provided separate collateral. A detailed filing note says HCI contributed approximately $6.19 million directly to three trust accounts. The same note attributes a separate deposit of about $5.8 million in net HCI-token proceeds to “the Company,” and says the accounts held $12.02 million at June 30. Gross subscriptions, net deposits, collateral and trust assets are different measures.

CryptoSlate Daily Brief

Daily signals, zero noise.

Market-moving headlines and context delivered every morning in one tight read.