The European Commission is reviewing MiCA, the EU’s crypto regulation, and the deadline for submissions falls on September 30, 2026 at 23:59 CEST. Anyone who wants to tell the Commission what works in Europe’s crypto rules and what does not has until that evening. Brussels then evaluates what it has received, and the questions that will sit on the table for the coming years are settled.
For an investor in Germany this has two sides. The first is immediate: you can take part, free of charge and without a lawyer. The second matters more. What the consultation asks about is a preview of where the EU could tighten its rules. Staking, DeFi, lending and tokenized deposits appear in it explicitly as open points. Those are the services many German portfolios now use without any clear rule on who is liable for them.
What the European Commission’s MiCA review actually is
MiCA is the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation, the single EU rulebook for crypto service providers, for token issuers and for stablecoins. Among other things it requires a firm to hold an authorization before it offers trading, custody or exchange services in the EU, and to be supervised by a national regulator. In Germany that regulator is BaFin.
The regulation builds in its own review. Articles 140 and 142 oblige the Commission to report on how MiCA works in practice and what has changed in the markets since it took effect. A legislative proposal may be attached to that report if the assessment shows a need for change. The current consultation is the evidence-gathering step behind it: the Commission is asking whether the regulation is still, in its own words, fit for purpose.
The process opened on May 20, 2026. We broke down the substantive direction of travel in a separate analysis at the time. What has been added since is mainly time pressure.
Deadline September 30, 2026: the dates that apply in the MiCA consultation
The consultation was originally due to close on August 31, 2026. The Commission extended the deadline at the end of June, according to the regulatory service Regulation Tomorrow from Norton Rose Fulbright on June 29, 2026 and on the basis of a notice in the Commission’s Finance News Hub. The official consultation page has shown September 30, 2026, 23:59 CEST, ever since.
An extended procedure is not a signal that something will follow quickly. The specialist assessment by FinanceFeeds dates the reports under Articles 140 and 142 to June 30, 2027. Only after that will it be decided whether a legislative proposal follows, and such a proposal would then still have to pass through the usual procedure between Parliament and Council. Realistically, we are talking about changes that would take effect in 2028 at the earliest.
Why the deadline counts anyway
Submissions that arrive after September 30 no longer feed into the assessment. Anyone who reacts only once a draft law is on the table is arguing about a text whose basic direction was set long before. Industry bodies and law firms know this and file early.
Targeted consultation or public consultation: which track applies to you
The Commission is running two tracks, and they address different audiences. The targeted consultation is intended, according to the description on the Commission’s page, for a specialist audience: crypto service providers, issuers, national and European supervisory authorities, central banks, finance ministries. The questionnaire there assumes technical knowledge and runs through a form in the EU Survey system.
Alongside it there is a public consultation on the Have your say portal, which is open to everyone, including private individuals with no industry background. If you invest yourself and want to describe where the rules help you in daily practice or get in your way, that is your track. Both tracks belong to the same initiative, the evaluation of the EU legal framework for crypto-asset markets.
One pointer that will save you trouble: the deadline stated on the targeted consultation page is September 30, 2026. For the public track, the portal displays the deadline that applies there. Check it before you start typing, and do not plan on the last evening.
DeFi, staking and lending: the biggest gap in MiCA’s scope
The part of the questionnaire most relevant to retail investors concerns what is currently unregulated or only half regulated. Assessments by several commercial law firms consistently list a block on new activities: decentralized finance applications, staking, lending and borrowing of crypto-assets, and the question of who is liable when access to a protocol runs through an app, a wallet or a web interface.
Staking is the case that touches the largest number of German portfolios. Briefly defined: in staking you deposit tokens in a network that uses them to secure transactions, and you receive an ongoing reward in return. MiCA does not settle conclusively whether and when a provider that carries out this deposit for you needs its own authorization. The differences between providers are correspondingly wide, and we have written up separately which arrangements require authorization in Germany.
In practice this means: if a material part of your income comes from staking or lending, the security of that income depends not only on the price but also on whether your provider holds an authorization and whether the EU explicitly captures this field in future. A look at the comparison of regulated crypto exchanges shows which firms are licensed in the EU and which services they offer under that license.
Stablecoins under MiCA: reserves, the right of redemption and significance thresholds
The second large block concerns stablecoins. MiCA recognizes two categories: e-money tokens, which are pegged to exactly one official currency, and asset-referenced tokens, which track a basket of currencies, commodities or other assets. Both are subject to requirements on own funds, on the composition and liquidity of the reserve, and on the right of holders to redeem at par at any time.
The consultation asks whether these requirements are calibrated correctly, how the thresholds for tokens classified as significant work in practice, and how to handle tokens issued in parallel inside and outside the EU. That sounds technical, but it has a very concrete consequence for you: whether a particular stablecoin remains tradable in Europe hangs on precisely these rules. In August 2026 the forced conversion of a large stablecoin at one provider showed how quickly such a decision reaches your own account.
Tokenized shares and hybrid tokens: where MiCA meets MiFID II
A third block of questions turns on the boundary. MiCA applies to crypto-assets that are not financial instruments. As soon as a token qualifies as a financial instrument, securities law applies instead, with MiFID II and the Prospectus Regulation. In between lies a grey area: tokenized fund units, tokenized money market instruments, governance tokens, wrapped tokens that represent another asset, and synthetic constructions that behave economically like a share but are legally something else.
The Commission wants to know where the boundary remains unclear in practice. This concerns you as soon as you hold products that replicate a share, because the answer determines which rights sit behind them and which authority is responsible.
Tokenized deposits and custody: who owns your balance if things go wrong
The block that is perhaps most underestimated concerns tokenized bank deposits and custody. The Commission asks how such deposits are to be classified under civil law, who owns the assets in a custody relationship, and how they relate to statutory deposit protection. For euro bank balances the position is clearly settled. For crypto-assets in a customer account, the decisive question is whether they can be separated out in an insolvency, meaning they do not fall into the estate.
A sober look at your own setup is worthwhile here. What sits with an authorized provider is covered by that firm’s regulatory duty to segregate client assets from its own. What sits in a self-managed wallet is subject to no supervision, but also to no one else’s insolvency risk. Both have drawbacks, and the consultation will change nothing about that split in the short term.
MiCA after the deadline: what does not change on October 1, 2026
So that no false expectation arises: on the day after the deadline, exactly the same law applies as before. The consultation changes not a single provision. The procedure gathers material for a report due in 2027. Anyone telling you that staking rewards will be banned or self-custody restricted as of October 1 has either misunderstood the process or is trying to sell you something.
What is worth doing today is taking stock of your providers. A count of the ESMA register by cryptoticker.io on August 6, 2026 found 329 authorizations granted, of which only 21 went to trading platforms. The number of licensed firms is therefore smaller than the range of offers available in Germany would suggest. Check the public ESMA register to see whether your provider is actually listed, and do not rely on marketing claims on its homepage.
Submitting a response: how to proceed before September 30
The process is manageable. You open the Commission’s consultation page, decide which track fits you and fill in the form. Registration in the Transparency Register is not required for private individuals, but you do have to state in what capacity you are responding.
What makes a submission useful
Contributions that carry weight in an assessment describe a concrete case rather than a general attitude. So it is better to set out which service was available in Germany, which one disappeared, what information was missing when you switched, which fee was not visible beforehand. Accounts of that kind are more valuable to the Commission than a position for or against regulation in principle. You do not have to answer every question; leaving blocks unanswered is explicitly provided for.
You will find the two entry points here: the targeted consultation on the MiCA review on the European Commission’s site and the public consultation on the Have your say portal.
MiCA consultation: what to take away
- Check where your income comes from. Staking and lending are named explicitly in the consultation as open points. If a relevant share of your return comes from them, look into the license your provider works under. The comparison of staking providers sets terms and lock-up periods side by side.
- Verify the authorization status of your trading venues. Not every service reachable from Germany is licensed in the EU, and with unlicensed providers the regulatory protection does not apply. The exchange comparison places the common firms in context.
- Document your transactions properly. Every shift in the legal framework raises the likelihood of additional record-keeping and reporting duties. A continuous history is not something you can save yourself later, so keep it now; the tax and tracking tools in comparison take the manual work off your hands.
(As of September 19, 2026. This article is not investment advice. Prices and fee structures change; check the terms with the provider before you buy.)
Be the first to comment