- China has called for a nationwide blockchain infrastructure network.
- The 19-measure plan links blockchain with computing and industrial development.
- The initiative does not signal a reversal of China’s cryptocurrency restrictions.
China is pushing to establish a national blockchain network as part of a new policy package aimed at strengthening the country’s digital infrastructure and its integration with the wider economy.
The 19-measure document, issued by the Communist Party of China Central Committee and the State Council on October 9, places blockchain development alongside national computing capacity, industrial internet systems and reforms to data governance.
According to Xinhua’s publication of the guidelines, the government wants to accelerate the integration of digital technologies with manufacturing and other productive industries.
The policy does not announce a new cryptocurrency or a public blockchain launch. Instead, it identifies distributed ledger infrastructure as one component of China’s broader industrial modernization strategy.
What China Wants Its Blockchain Network to Do
The blockchain initiative appears in the ninth measure of the policy document, alongside a proposal to develop an integrated national computing power network.
The two systems serve different purposes.
Computing infrastructure provides the processing resources required by digital applications, while blockchain systems can maintain shared records and verify transactions between participating organizations.
In manufacturing, such infrastructure could support the exchange of production records, shipment information and supplier documentation across businesses.
Financial institutions could use verified commercial records when assessing borrowers or processing transactions, although the policy does not prescribe a specific blockchain-based banking system.
The document also supports the expansion of smart manufacturing, industrial internet infrastructure and China’s East Data, West Computing initiative.
These programs already form part of the country’s digital development strategy. The new directive places blockchain within that wider infrastructure agenda rather than treating it as an isolated technology project.
How the Proposal Differs From China’s Existing BSN
China has previously supported blockchain infrastructure through the Blockchain-based Service Network, commonly known as BSN.
The initiative was developed to provide standardized infrastructure and tools for organizations building blockchain applications.
However, the new national network proposal should not automatically be interpreted as an expansion or replacement of BSN.
The October guidelines do not identify BSN as the operator of the proposed network or establish how the two initiatives would interact.
CHINA / DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE
Two Blockchain Strategies, Different Stages
Existing BSN infrastructure compared with the proposed national network
| CATEGORY | EXISTING BSN |
PROPOSED National Network |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Blockchain application deployment | Nationwide blockchain infrastructure |
| Status | Established |
Policy stage |
| Architecture | Multiple blockchain frameworks | Not specified |
| Operator | Existing BSN organizational structure | Not designated |
| Rollout | Existing services and infrastructure | No launch schedule announced |
Key distinction:
China’s new policy does not establish whether the proposed national network will integrate with or replace BSN.
The distinction is important for businesses evaluating potential opportunities.
An existing blockchain service platform offers identifiable products and infrastructure. A national policy directive establishes government priorities but does not necessarily create an immediately accessible network.
Future implementation documents will determine whether Beijing intends to connect existing systems, introduce new technical standards or establish additional infrastructure.
Data Rights Could Be More Important Than Tokenization
China’s policy also calls for improvements to the rules governing data ownership, circulation and commercial use.
These provisions address a practical obstacle to information sharing between companies.
A manufacturer may need to verify a supplier’s production records without gaining unrestricted access to its internal databases. A bank may require reliable transaction information while remaining subject to financial and data protection requirements.
Blockchain-based records can help participants verify that information has been recorded or changed, but they do not independently determine who has legal rights over the underlying data.
That requires enforceable rules covering access, ownership and permitted use.
The guidelines propose further development of China’s data market, including mechanisms for trading data resources and distributing economic benefits.
For enterprise blockchain providers, those rules could prove as consequential as the network infrastructure itself.
A shared ledger has limited commercial value if participating organizations cannot legally exchange the information it records.
Computing Expansion Gives the Policy a Broader Context
China’s computing infrastructure has expanded rapidly under existing national programs.
According to Xinhua’s September reporting, the country had established more than 70 computing transmission corridors and approved 17 regional interconnection nodes by June 2026.
Intelligent computing capacity reached 2,185 exaflops, up 177% year over year.
These figures are not measures of blockchain network performance. They describe the broader computing resources that China is developing for artificial intelligence, industrial applications and data processing.
The proposed blockchain network would address a separate infrastructure requirement: coordinating trusted records and transactions across participating systems.
Its eventual value will depend on interoperability, operating costs and whether businesses can use it without duplicating existing infrastructure.
What the Plan Means for Crypto Markets
The announcement does not change China’s restrictions on cryptocurrency trading and related businesses.
Beijing has consistently distinguished between blockchain technology used for approved applications and decentralized cryptocurrency markets.
The October policy continues that approach.
It does not authorize cryptocurrency exchanges, establish a tradable national blockchain token or announce permissionless access to the proposed infrastructure.
The more immediate implications concern enterprise software, industrial data services and technology providers working within China’s regulatory framework.
The guidelines also address cross-border data flows, but they do not remove existing security and compliance requirements governing international transfers.
For cryptocurrency investors, the distinction prevents an unsupported conclusion that national blockchain investment will directly increase demand for Bitcoin, XRP or other publicly traded digital assets.
The government’s next implementation steps will matter more than the announcement itself.
Technical standards, designated operators, financing arrangements and deployment targets remain unspecified in the published directive.
Until those details emerge, China’s national blockchain network is best understood as a formal infrastructure priority, not an operational platform or a change in cryptocurrency policy.






Be the first to comment