Pump.fun token promotions have come under scrutiny after blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps accused cryptocurrency influencer Ethan (@0xEthan) of allegedly earning $125,000 through 49 token promotions. The firm claims wallets linked to Ethan purchased tokens before his public recommendations and sold them afterward, raising questions about promotional transparency and trading practices.
In an October 9, 2026, post on X, Bubblemaps estimated that the alleged activity generated $45,000 in trading profits and $80,000 in promotional rewards. The firm also reported that suspected linked wallets began selling an average of three minutes after Ethan’s initial callouts. These figures remain allegations, not independently verified findings.
Also Read | Aave Expands DeFi TVL Growth as AAVE Price Setup Draws Attention
Pump.fun token was the chosen subject in this research since it is a Solana-based platform where users can create and exchange tokens, including memecoins. As per Bubblemaps, Ethan shared recommendations with about 88,000 followers. In total, 49 promotions were analyzed, and the researchers noticed wallet activity that seemed to be following a repetitive pattern after the calls out by Ethan.
According to Bubblemaps, suspicious connected wallets bought the tokens before their public promotion by Ethan, and then started selling the tokens after the callouts. The described pattern could provide early buyers with an edge if the recommendation creates extra demand for the token. However, the transaction time by itself does not mean that Ethan had control over those wallets and was coordinating their purchase and sale of tokens.
Alleged Trading Profits and Rewards Total $125,000
Bubblemaps split the projected amount of $125,000 into two types of earnings: about $45,000 of trading profits and $80,000 for promotions of tokens. This is significant since the total amount includes both the trading profit and payments related to the promotion of the token, rather than trading profit only.
According to pump.fun, it offers Callout Rewards Program by which qualified participants can get money as part of their reward for recommending tokens. Its official terms deal with misleading promotion, manipulation of the market, and coordinated actions to increase rewards. Pump.fun token also may decide to investigate the suspicious activity and deny rewards if there is need to do so according to the program rules.
Pump.fun Token Rally Faces Key Resistance
Separately, crypto analyst Crypto Patel shared a technical outlook for Pump.fun’s native PUMP token, describing a breakout from a long-term falling wedge followed by a retest and a rally of more than three times its earlier level. The analyst said the token had pulled back from a resistance zone and suggested considering partial profit-taking.
Crypto Patel identified potential buying zones between $0.0034 and $0.0040, and between $0.0023 and $0.0025. The analyst also listed price targets of $0.010, $0.015 and $0.024, stating that a confirmed breakout above $0.0070 could support another upward move. These levels represent the analyst’s projections, not confirmed future prices.
The allegations point out a lack of transparency on cryptocurrency exchanges, where publicly posted recommendations can impact how interested followers are in the new token. The follower may not be aware of whether the recommender already owns the coin, acquired it from other wallets, and whether there is some compensation involved with the promotion.
While the regulations set out by Pump.fun could apply to some types of misconduct, it cannot simply be taken as proof based on the alleged buying and selling pattern. It will have to be established who owns the wallet, how the coordination is done, what promotional activities were undertaken and whether there was appropriate disclosure about any compensation or holdings.
Another example of the limitations of using blockchain analytics tools can be provided here. Blockchain is used to detect the buying and selling pattern, and to find recurring patterns within. While blockchain provides that data
Wallet Ownership and Potential Enforcement Remain Unclear
Based on the available information at the moment, it has not been confirmed independently that there was an enforcement process regarding Ethan. Further evidence and statements from the influencer, wallets, and Pump.fun can be used to prove the claim and whether there was a breach of any of the platform’s guidelines.
This implies that the estimated figure should not be taken at face value. In this regard, it does not mean that Ethan himself received all the profits and incentives that are associated with this case. Additionally, it should be considered that the estimated average three minutes only refers to the transaction time.
From the perspective of the Pump.fun users, this case illustrates the importance of verifying one’s own token holding, disclosure of promotions, and transaction details before taking action after any influencer’s recommendations. From the platform side, this case also raises questions regarding the promotion rewards verification and investigation of suspected manipulations.
Also Read | Solana Ecosystem Growth Strengthens as SOL Price Eyes Breakout
Be the first to comment