Experts Suggest Possible Social Engineering in $280M Drift Protocol Exploit ⋆ ZyCrypto

Binance
Bitbuy


Wormhole Airdrop Mishap: Exploiter Behind $323m Ethereum Theft Accidentally Included
Wormhole Airdrop Mishap: Exploiter Behind $323m Ethereum Theft Accidentally Included


Add ZyCrypto News On Google

Blockchain security firms are currently investigating the infamous Drift Protocol breach that drained over $280 million. Initial reports point to social engineering rather than a smart contract or program bug. The April 1 event adds to the growing list of digital asset exploits negatively impacting markets.

Drift Protocol Rules Out Contract Bug

In social media posts after the incident, the protocol, alongside blockchain experts, released a brief investigation of the hack. According to the company, a bad actor gained access to the protocol in a novel attack.

okex

Initial losses were estimated at over $280 million based on on-chain data. The company termed the attack a “sophisticated operation” planned for many weeks before execution. Although full investigations are yet to be released, initial rumors of a smart contract bug or Drift’s programs have been ruled out.

Hackers gained access via durable-nonce accounts before obtaining the required multisig approvals and executing admin transfers within minutes.

As a result, all borrow/lend and trading deposits are affected except DSOL, but on Drift. The whole exploit has been narrowed down to possible social engineering or transaction misrepresentation. Following the incident, Drift warned users to halt deposits pending investigation and has partnered with security firms to ascertain the exploit’s root cause.

Follow ZyCrypto On Google News

&nbsp

Furthermore, the protocol has initiated a wider response involving exchanges to trace lost assets. Although more investigations are expected, the community’s reaction to the general hack was unsatisfactory.

Crypto analyst DBCrypto shed more light on the attack, describing it as worse than the initial forecast. 

Drift Protocol just released their thread on the $280 million hack. It’s worse than anyone thought too. There was no code exploit. It wasn’t a flash loan. It wasn’t even a traditional key theft. Solana has a feature called “durable nonces” that lets you sign a transaction today but execute it days or weeks later. Sound familiar EVM critics?

After a series of suspicious transfers, the company warned users on X, stressing that it’s not an April Fool’s joke. Total outflows amounted to 15 tokens, as the bailout value dropped from $309 million to $41 million.

Recent crypto hacks continue to affect the market as traders struggle through a rough patch. These events have lowered sentiment, driven down prices, and dampened expectations. In addition to slow price action, hacks heighten regulatory scrutiny, which affects faster crypto developments.



Source link

fiverr

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*