Solana’s decentralised exchanges booked more individual trades in a single trading week than the New York Stock Exchange. The tracker flipthe.market, which builds on data from Blockworks Research, counts roughly 208 million spot trades on Solana for the week of September 14 to 20, 2026, against 189 million on the NYSE. It is the first documented case of a blockchain overtaking one of the world’s largest securities exchanges on trade count alone.
The number is real, and it is still easy to misread. A trade on a Solana DEX and a trade on the NYSE are economically two very different things, and that difference decides whether this record concerns you as an investor at all. This article separates the two questions: first what was measured, then what you should check if you swap on a decentralised marketplace.
Solana DEX versus NYSE: what the count of 208 million trades actually measures
What is measured is the number of trades, meaning how often a buy met a sell at all. What is not measured is how much money moved in the process. Both sides of the survey put the Solana figure at roughly 208 million, but they differ on the comparison value and on the dating: the tracker based on Blockworks data cites 189 million NYSE trades for the week to September 20, while a second analysis built on a Kobeissi Letter chart arrives at around 190 million for the week to September 13. The range is therefore 189 to 190 million, and the sources do not agree on which calendar week saw the first overtake.
A DEX is a decentralised exchange: a program on a blockchain that settles swaps directly between two wallets, without a company holding user funds or matching the orders. That design is precisely why the trade count can run so high, and why the rest of this article is necessary.
Anyone who has ever run a swap on Solana knows the practical difference. The trade settles in under a second, costs a fraction of a cent in network fees and needs no brokerage account. That very many very small trades arise under such conditions is no surprise; it follows from the cost structure.
Memecoin platforms account for roughly 57 percent of trades: why the comparison limps
In the same analysis, about 118 million of the 208 million trades fall to a single memecoin launchpad, roughly 57 percent. These are mostly micro purchases of freshly minted tokens, often worth a few dollars, frequently triggered by automated programs. On the NYSE, a trade as a rule sits behind an equity order of a markedly larger size.
The headline is therefore not wrong, but it describes a different process from the one most readers assume. The blockchain wins the comparison on the number of transactions. On the question of how much capital changes hands, it remains orders of magnitude behind. How wide that gap is can be calculated, and that is what I did.
Own measurement: $3.2 billion in DEX volume in 24 hours across 125 protocols
cryptoticker.io collected this analysis itself on September 23, 2026. Method: a call to DefiLlama’s open interface for the trading volumes of every decentralised exchange recorded on Solana, on September 23, 2026 at around 22:10 UTC, HTTP 200, with no post-processing of the raw values. Objects checked: 125 individual DEX protocols on Solana.
The finding: across all 125 protocols together, roughly $3.20 billion was swapped in the preceding 24 hours, roughly $21.22 billion in the preceding seven days and roughly $79.96 billion in the preceding 30 days. Against the previous day, daily volume was 6.8 percent lower. The five largest protocols account for roughly $2.04 billion between them, just under 64 percent of daily volume; the single largest platform came to $634 million.
The distribution is more interesting than the total. The two marketplaces belonging to the memecoin complex stand together for roughly $755 million, around 24 percent of daily volume. On trade count, though, the survey cited at the outset puts them at roughly 57 percent. An average memecoin trade is therefore markedly smaller than a trade on the remaining Solana exchanges. What I could not verify is how many of these trades come from automated trading programs and how many from human beings; the interface does not supply that breakdown.
Roughly $100 per trade on average: what separates trade count from trading volume
Setting the weekly volume against the weekly number of trades produces the figure that puts the record in perspective. On the weekly value of $17.3 billion cited in the survey, the average trade comes to about $83. Using my own seven-day figure of $21.22 billion instead gives roughly $102. The two values refer to slightly shifted time windows, which is why the range appears here and not a smoothed average.
An average trade between $83 and $102 describes a market made up of very many very small transactions. For you as an investor, that is the actual news, because the entire checklist part of this article follows from it. Anyone active on such a marketplace produces, in case of doubt, several hundred transactions a year rather than five. And every single one of them is a separate event for tax purposes.
24 hours against 6.5 trading hours: the structural advantage of the blockchain
The NYSE trades on weekdays from 9:30 to 16:00 New York local time, so 6.5 hours on five days. A blockchain runs continuously, on seven days, holidays included. That alone yields a multiple of the possible settlement time before a single user trades any more than before.
This difference carries half the explanation of the record. Putting the two numbers side by side compares a market with opening hours against one without. That says nothing against the performance of the network; it merely limits what may be inferred from the comparison.
A DEX without CASP authorisation: why MiCA and BaFin do not protect you on a swap
The EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation, MiCA for short, governs providers of crypto-asset services. Such providers need authorisation, in Germany from BaFin, and are bound by duties on custody, complaint handling and disclosure. Recital 22 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 states expressly, however, that services provided in a fully decentralised manner without any intermediary should fall outside its scope.
In practice that means the following. If you buy on a regulated exchange, an authorised company stands behind the transaction. If you swap straight out of your own wallet against a smart contract, nobody stands there. No deposit protection, no complaints body, no supervisor that steps in if there is a dispute. Where exactly the line between “still a service provider” and “fully decentralised” runs in an individual case has not been settled to this day; the indicators include administrator keys, custody of user assets and marketing by an identifiable company. We have broken down which duties apply on the regulated side in our overview of MiCA obligations for crypto companies.
For the choice of your entry point, this is the decisive fork. Anyone who prefers the regulated route will find the providers available in Germany in our comparison of crypto exchanges; anyone who deliberately goes to decentralised marketplaces takes on the checks themselves.
Every swap is a disposal: how Section 23 EStG captures DEX trades
Swapping one token for another is not a neutral event for tax purposes but a sale of the one and a purchase of the other. The governing provision is Section 23(1) sentence 1 no. 2 of the German Income Tax Act, the Einkommensteuergesetz. In the wording that applies today, private disposal transactions are disposals “of other assets where the period between acquisition and disposal is not more than one year”. Crypto-assets fall under those other assets.
From that follows the one-year holding period many investors know. Hold a token for longer than a year and then sell it, and there is no taxable event any more. Swap within the year, and there is one. In a market averaging around a hundred dollars per trade, that means practically every active user trades inside the period and therefore sits in taxable territory.
The order is not arbitrary either. Anyone who bought the same token several times at different prices has to determine which holding counts as sold first. How swaps, liquidity pools and pool income are to be classified in detail, we have taken apart in our breakdown of DeFi taxes on swaps and liquidity pools.
The 1,000 euro exemption threshold and the one-year period: what is left after hundreds of swaps
Section 23(3) sentence 5 EStG provides: “Gains shall remain tax-free if the total gain realised from private disposal transactions in the calendar year was less than 1,000 euros.” Two details of this are regularly overlooked.
First, this is an exemption threshold and not a tax-free allowance. If your total gain comes to 999 euros, it stays tax-free. If it comes to 1,000 euros, the full amount is taxable, and not only the part above the line. Second, the threshold applies to all private disposal transactions of the calendar year taken together, including gains from other transactions that fall under the same section.
Anyone making several hundred small swaps spread across the year accumulates many individual gains and individual losses that net into an overall result. The fact that the individual amounts are small is no help there. What counts is the sum, and the sum cannot be determined at all without clean records.
Loss offsetting under Section 23(3): why DEX losses count only against a narrow pot
Sentence 7 of the same provision limits what happens to losses. They may be offset “only up to the amount of the gain that the taxpayer realised from private disposal transactions in the same calendar year” and may not be deducted under Section 10d. Under sentence 8, however, they do reduce income from private disposal transactions of the immediately preceding or the following assessment periods.
Translated: a loss from a memecoin swap cannot be set against your salary or against interest income. It works only inside the same pot, that is against other private disposal gains, and it can be carried into other years. Anyone running mostly losses in the current year gains nothing from them for tax purposes as long as no gains of the same type stand against them.
No tax certificate from a smart contract: why the record-keeping falls to you
A German custodian bank issues you a tax certificate at the end of the year. A smart contract does not. Every transaction does sit permanently and publicly on the blockchain, but in the form of addresses, token amounts and timestamps, not in euros and not sorted according to German tax law.
The conversion into euros at the relevant moment, the matching of acquisitions to disposals and the determination of the holding period are work you have to do yourself or have done for you. Specialised software exists for exactly that, reading wallet addresses and preparing the events; the providers relevant to the German market are listed in our comparison of crypto tax software and portfolio trackers. What matters most is that you keep the records continuously and do not start in the following year. Anyone who has to reconstruct hundreds of events after the fact is working against themselves.
DAC8 reports service providers, not your wallet: the gap that does not let you off
Under the EU directive DAC8, providers of crypto-asset services report their customers’ transaction data automatically to the tax authorities. Data collection has been running since January 1, 2026, and the first transmission is scheduled for 2027. Anyone trading through an authorised exchange must therefore assume that the tax administration sees their activity there in any case.
On a swap out of a self-custodied wallet against a smart contract there is no reporting service provider. Tax exemption does not follow from that. The duty to declare stays entirely with you; what is missing is merely the party that would take it off your hands and confirm your figures. In practice that means a higher burden of proof, not a lower one.
On top of that, the chain as a rule does not run seamlessly outside the reported world. Whoever deposits euros buys from an authorised provider, and that event is recorded. What happens afterwards in your own wallet is something you have to be able to connect to it.
Slippage, priority fee and failed transactions: the costs beside the price
On a decentralised marketplace you rarely pay the price alone. The executed price deviates from the quoted one when other trades pass through between order and execution; that deviation is called slippage and can be capped in the wallet. On Solana there is also a voluntary priority fee, which at times of high network load decides whether your order makes it into the next block at all.
If the transaction fails, the network fee is spent anyway while the swap has not happened. What causes it in an individual case depends on the network load, on the slippage tolerance that was set and on whether the chosen trading route still had enough liquidity at the moment of execution. On an average trade of around a hundred dollars, these side costs can make up a noticeable share of the stake, and they arise on every single attempt.
From euros onto the Solana DEX: which buying route stays regulated in Germany
A decentralised marketplace does not accept euros. The usual route runs through a provider authorised in the EU, where you buy SOL or a stablecoin against euros, from there to a wallet in your own custody and only then onto the DEX. Each of these steps carries its own costs and its own risks.
The move into self-custody is the critical point. From the moment the keys are with you, there is no longer any party that can undo a mistake. A mistyped address, an approval granted carelessly to a contract or a compromised seed phrase lead to a final loss. Anyone moving larger amounts should keep the keys on a device that has never been connected to the internet.
Solana price levels above and below: what the rally is measured against now
SOL was quoted at $114.69 on September 23, 2026 at 22:01 UTC according to CoinGecko. Over 24 hours it shows a decline of 2.97 percent, over seven days a gain of 16.29 percent. The price has therefore ridden the broad weekly upswing and has lately been giving ground again along with the wider market; the all-time high dates from January 19, 2025 and is far away.
To the downside, the mark of $100 is the next psychologically round level; to the upside sits the area around $120, where the price failed most recently. These are reference points and no forecast. You will find the ongoing price development together with analysis on our Solana price prediction. Whether the record number of trades supports the price is open, because a large part of those trades takes place in tokens that share only the infrastructure with SOL itself.
Checking your Solana DEX trading: what you take away from this
The record describes a real shift in market structure, and it describes it in a metric that favours small transactions. What counts for you is less the headline than the question of what you do when you trade on this market. Three steps are worth taking straight away.
- Count your swaps for the current year before the year ends. Every swap inside the one-year holding period is a separate taxable event, and the exemption threshold of 1,000 euros applies to the sum of all private disposal transactions. A tool that reads your wallet addresses and prepares the events in euros is in our comparison of crypto tax software and portfolio trackers.
- Establish which authorised provider your entry runs through. The euro route as a rule goes via a regulated exchange, and its fees and withdrawal options determine the bulk of your costs. The providers available in Germany are in our comparison of crypto exchanges.
- Separate trading funds and long-term holdings physically from each other. What you move on a DEX belongs in a wallet with a limited balance, and the long-term holding belongs on a device with no network connection. Suitable models and their differences are in our hardware wallet comparison.
The figures on the trading week come from the flipthe.market analysis based on Blockworks Research data, the quoted statutory wording from Section 23 EStG at gesetze-im-internet.de. The volume figures in this article rest on the own data call described above.
(As of September 23, 2026. This article is not investment advice. Prices and fee structures change; check the terms with the provider before you buy.)
Be the first to comment