Crypto startup valuations hit a record in the third quarter, but the typical funding round shrank by about 40% from its own record, while pre-seed deals grew their share.
Key Takeaways
1Crypto startup valuations hit record near $90 million
2Median deal fell from record $4.9M to $3M
3Pre-seed share of deals rose to 25%
4Later-stage firms took 78% of Q2 capital
In an October 23 preview of the firm’s third-quarter venture report, Galaxy’s vice president of research, Thaddeus Pinakiewicz, put the valuation record at roughly $90 million. The same data showed the median crypto deal sliding to about $3 million from an all-time high of around $4.9 million a quarter earlier.
Valuations rebounded to a record after two weaker quarters
The record came after a dip. Galaxy’s second-quarter report showed crypto startup valuations peaking in the fourth quarter of 2025, then falling sharply through the first half of 2026 before this quarter’s rebound. Valuations across venture capital outside crypto also reached a new high, so crypto was moving with the wider private market rather than on its own.
Deal sizes ran on a different clock. They peaked in the second quarter, just as valuations bottomed out, and then gave back much of that gain as valuations climbed. Two records arrived back to back, pointing in opposite directions.
| Galaxy data | Q2 2026 | Q3 2026 | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Startup valuations | Below Q4 2025 peak | Record, about $90M | ▲ |
| Median deal size | Record, about $4.9M | About $3M | ▼ |
| Pre-seed share of deals | 21% | 25% | ▲ |
| Later-stage share of deals | 26% | 24% | ▼ |
Galaxy had valuation data for only 16% of Q2 deals, skewed toward later-stage companies.
A record drawn from later-stage deals, a median pulled down by pre-seed
Galaxy tracks the pre-seed share as a gauge of founder activity and investor risk appetite, and it describes the later-stage share as still elevated against its historical norm, a sign of a maturing market. The pre-seed share had already edged up in the second quarter, so the jump to 25% extends a rise rather than starting one. Both readings point to the deal mix as a likely reason the two records moved apart.
A bigger share of small first rounds can pull the median deal down even if no stage raises less. The valuation figure comes from a different slice of the market: the few deals with disclosed valuations skew heavily toward later-stage companies, so the record largely reflects what mature businesses were worth to investors. That explanation fits the data, but Galaxy has not yet published the stage-level figures that would confirm it.
Most of the money was already going to established companies before the third quarter. In the second quarter, investors put $5.68 billion into 384 crypto deals, with later-stage companies taking about 78% of the capital. If that held in the third quarter, investors were spreading more small checks across new teams while keeping most of their dollars with mature ones.
Older companies collect the dollars, younger ones the deals
Galaxy’s second-quarter breakdown shows how deep that split runs. Businesses in its trading, exchange, investing and lending category raised about $3.52 billion, roughly three-fifths of all capital, from just 51 deals, and more than nine-tenths of that money went to later-stage companies.
By deal count, activity was far more spread out. Payments and rewards startups and DeFi projects each closed 40 deals, followed by Web3 and gaming companies with 37, tokenization with 36, enterprise blockchain with 34 and infrastructure with 32. Galaxy found meaningful pre-seed or seed activity in enterprise blockchain, DeFi, privacy and security, tokenization, mining and payments, while wallets and layer-2 projects skewed toward mature companies.
Company age follows the same pattern. Startups founded in 2018 raised the most capital in the second quarter, about $2 billion, ahead of the 2020 cohort at roughly $1.1 billion, while companies founded in 2025, 2022 and 2023 led by number of deals. Geography splits the same way: U.S.-based companies took 73.5% of the dollars but only 39.1% of the deals.
Why the smaller median matters more to founders
A valuation sets the price of ownership, while the cash raised sets how long a company can keep operating. At a net burn of $250,000 a month, the difference between the two quarters’ medians looks like this:
$3M round (Q3 median): 12 months of runway
$4.9M round (Q2 median): about 20 months of runway
A higher valuation lets founders sell a smaller stake for the same money, but it does not add a month of runway.
The venture funds behind those checks are consolidating. Galaxy counted roughly $3.9 billion raised across just five new crypto venture funds in the second quarter, the fewest in a quarter since 2019, yet the average new fund grew to about $378 million and the median to about $80 million. Annualized, first-half fundraising points to around $10 billion for 2026, above the $8.75 billion raised in 2025. More money is going to fewer managers, and Galaxy says AI, spot crypto exchange-traded products and digital asset treasury companies are competing for the same allocators. Larger funds tend to write larger checks, which may leave the smallest first rounds to a narrower group of early-stage specialists.
What Galaxy’s full Q3 report should settle
Galaxy says its full quarterly report is coming soon. Three figures in it will test this reading.
Total capital and deals
The first half brought $10.02 billion across 744 deals. Matching 2025’s $20.3 billion would take about $5.1 billion a quarter. A few large rounds can swing totals, as one deal did in Q1 2025.
Deal size by stage
Steady medians within each stage would confirm the pre-seed mix as the main reason the overall median fell.
Later-stage capital share
A figure near Q2’s 78% would show most money still going to mature companies as early deals multiply.
This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Private-company valuations and funding estimates depend on available disclosures.
Kosta has reported on cryptocurrency markets and blockchain infrastructure since 2020, bringing over six years of hands-on experience in the crypto industry built through daily tracking of markets, trends, and emerging blockchain developments. Specializing in Bitcoin on-chain analysis, institutional ETF flows, and digital asset price action, his work at Coindoo has been cited by other news agencies and consistently covers market developments with a focus on data-driven reporting across Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and XRP.
Over the years, Kosta has contributed to multiple crypto media outlets in different regions, authoring over 6,000 articles across the sector. His reporting spans cryptocurrency markets and the broader fintech industry, tracking not only price action but also the technological and regulatory forces shaping the ecosystem.
To support his analysis, Kosta actively leverages on-chain data and metrics from leading platforms such as Santiment, Glassnode, and CryptoQuant, enabling deeper, evidence-based market insights. He believes in the power of transparency and the data that underpins the blockchain ecosystem.
His academic background in Marketing Management from Denmark further complements his analytical approach, adding a strong understanding of communication strategy and content positioning to his work.
Be the first to comment