Early to Party? Ripple CTO Emeritus Reacts to Ex-SEC Chair Gensler’s 2020 AI Paper

Bybit
Paxful


Ripple CTO emeritus David Schwartz has reacted to a resurfaced 2020 paper by former SEC Chair Gary Gensler, which pointed out that as deep learning in finance moves to a mature stage of broad adoption, it may lead to financial system fragility and economy-wide risks.

The discussion was revived by X user Andrew Curran, who believes that Gensler might have been “early to the party” in foreseeing the systemic risks posed by broad adoption of deep learning in finance.

According to Curran, Torsten Slok, chief economist at Apollo, warned that mass adoption of AI agents could trigger a bank run as they optimize user investments. He added that Gary Gensler, who served as SEC chair for the last few years, warned that the same issue may arise in the markets: the pursuit of algorithmic perfection at scale destroys system stability.

Binance

Peter Brandt Names Stellar (XLM) as Long-Shot Crypto Pick


XRP Headlines Altcoins Ahead of Busy Macro Week, Binance’s New Listing Live with SpaceX Campaign: Main Crypto News This Morning

In November 2020, Gary Gensler co-authored a paper titled “Deep Learning and Financial Stability” with Lily Bailey at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Sloan School of Management before becoming SEC head, which Curran shared alongside his tweet.

You Might Also Like

Title news

The paper noted at the time that the financial sector was entering a new era of rapidly advancing data analytics as deep learning models were adopted into its technology stack. It further stated that existing financial sector regulatory regimes, which were built in an earlier era of data analytics technology, might likely fall short in addressing the systemic risks posed by broad adoption of deep learning in finance.

Ripple CTO emeritus reacts

Schwartz responded to Curran’s post, writing: “I think a lot of this makes sense. The part that doesn’t is the they’ll be so smart that they’ll do dumb things part.”

Schwartz’s comment appears to counter the idea that more intelligent AI agents would produce more irrational outcomes, while seemingly acknowledging the general concern that such automated decisions could be made en masse.

You Might Also Like

Title news

Autonomous AI agents are capable of reasoning, planning, and executing multi-step tasks across the internet.

With AI agents increasingly being developed for autonomous decision-making, the question of how thousands or millions of independently operating systems interact could become an important consideration for financial infrastructure and regulators.



Source link

Blockonomics

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*