We were promised jetpacks, but also the inevitable wave of Crypto M&A, with TradFi firms also jumping into the fray. This year has disappointed the forecasters, however, with estimates putting Q1 volumes at only half last year’s deal volume. But the Bullish deal looks like the starting gun for the new Crypto-TradFi trade, and it’s going to run.
At first it looked like the conventional wisdom was correct, with Mastercard’s ~$1.5 billion purchase of stablecoin infra provider BVNK in March, and Kraken’s recent $600 million acquisition of stablecoin payments firm Reap. But the forward signal is the biggest deal of the year so far, last week’s acquisition of Equiniti by Bullish for $4.2 billion — $2.35 billion in Bullish stock plus $1.85 billion of assumed debt. While Crypto/Crypto deals are still happening, the new new here is the man-bites-dog inversion of Crypto acquiring TradFi at size. This wasn’t supposed to happen given the relatively lower growth of legacy TradFi. But that obscures a key fact: high-multiple growth stocks make these deals immediately and dramatically accretive on a per share basis.
The Bullish Deal
Equiniti provides TradFi stock transfer services, i.e., it makes sure that your gifted Tesla shares make their way into your nephew’s brokerage account. Backed by Siris Capital, the private sponsor that took them private in 2021, Equiniti handles a majority of the FTSE 100 and one-third of the S&P 500. Bullish sees this as a crucial leg up towards offering full stack tokenization – from issuance through trading and settlement – to Equiniti’s corporate issuers and their shareholders.
That’s the strategic vision, but the deal magic is under the hood. Bullish was trading at roughly 16x its 2026 standalone revenues pre-announcement, driven by its healthy growth prospects. It looks like Equiniti was acquired for roughly 4.6x revenues, or around one-third of Bullish’s revenue multiple. Likewise Bullish’s EBITDA multiple looks to be roughly 3x Equiniti’s. And a high multiple stock buying a low multiple stock creates accretion. So even after issuing roughly 37% more shares, Bullish’s revenue and EBITDA per share may have doubled or better. Look for more high growth Cryptos to run the same play with strategic but lower growth TradFis this year.
Of course this stock arb play reminds those of a certain age of the Dotcom era, when whiz kid companies used their stock to acquire legacy stalwarts. The lesson was clear: most of these deals languished because their speculative synergies never showed up (e.g., AOL/Time Warner). TradFi infrastructure like stock transfer, by comparison, represents real operational overlap.
Under the Hood
There’s another critical wrinkle to the Crypto/TradFi stock arb trade, however. Which is that stock-for-stock acquisitions can have one price at announcement and a very different value at the closing. Essentially, the parties need to allocate the risk of the inevitable change in their respective stock prices in the often-lengthy period between signing and close. A fixed exchange ratio means the seller bears the risk of the downturn in the buyer’s stock price, whereas a fixed value deal does the opposite.
Bullish/Equiniti provides an interesting example of the significance of the exchange ratio dynamic. The deal isn’t expected to close until January 2027, and Siris can only sell its Bullish stock in defined tranches over an 18 month post-close lock up period.
The exchange ratio here is fixed shares, which means Siris bears all of the risk that Bullish trades down over the next 26 months, but also the gain if Bullish trades up. So in reality this isn’t a sponsor exiting, but rather an investor going long on Bullish over time, with two board seats for added control.
There’s no better source of immediate validation than the market itself, which endorsed the Bullish deal with a double-digit pop in its stock price.
Why M&A Will Start to Speed Up
Two related reasons. First, the open secret of crypto today is that there are far more crypto logos right now than any rational industry would support. Consider, as but one example, a16z’s recent market map of the stablecoin sector which lists over 200 distinct companies. Whereas most industries tend to settle into three larger firms plus a handful of specialists. Beyond that the VC money won’t be available and the logos that don’t consolidate will die off.
Second, the acquirors know that by definition periods of consolidation are a game of musical chairs. Every deal takes a high-quality target off the board, so better to move first than get stuck with what’s left. Which means that the Nelson family that owns Continental Stock Transfer — now the largest independent transfer agent after Computershare and Broadridge — is likely very popular right now.
What’s Next for Crypto M&A in 2026
So which Crypto/TradFi stock arb deals will join the 2026 deal list? A handful of key criteria seem clear. First, choice verticals will represent scarce real estate that can’t readily be built, and where there’s competitive edge to owning versus simply renting. Second, there’s real FOMO risk to losing the best Monopoly properties on the strategic roadmap. And third, these verticals will be predominantly investor-owned versus strategic, as historically strategics have proven far more hesitant to accept stock as deal consideration absent some big new strategic alliance.
What might that look like in practice? Three particular TradFi verticals look particularly interesting for the Crypto/TradFi trade.
Institutional Borrow. Crypto exchanges have made it clear they want to become the place where everyone trades everything – stocks, treasuries, crypto, stables – in one account with all of it available as collateral. And these are blockchain products: a trader on a crypto venue buys a contract that tracks the price of Tesla — called a perp — margined and cleared on the blockchain in stablecoins. No broker, no clearinghouse, no market hours, and climbing steeply in volume right now.
But to hedge a Tesla perp on a crypto venue, someone still has to borrow actual Tesla shares from a beneficial owner. And no major crypto exchange owns a full-scale, institutional grade securities lending function. Firms like sponsor-backed Pirum are the bridge.
Title Insurance. Today if the idea of owning a slice of a gleaming Class A Manhattan office tower appeals to you, you’ll need an institutional-sized check; otherwise you’re stuck with a pooled property REIT. Tokenization breaks the $30 trillion illiquid asset class wide open: via the blockchain that tower can be divided into a million tradeable pieces, which is why market leaders like BlackRock and Apollo are among the pioneers in tokenization.
The little appreciated problem is that even tokenized real estate is meaningless without clean title. Every tokenized building still relies on a real deed, and if the title isn’t clean the token represents nada. Title insurance is the backstop, and a public name like Old Republic could entertain a carve-out.
A related play involves commercial real estate loan servicing. While smart contracts may handle the post-cash distribution, most of this work takes place off-chain in the analog world.
IP & Indices. In TradFi World, indices like the S&P 500 rule supreme as the engine powering everything from reference prices for ETFs, while other S&P indices power evaluative prices for illiquid securities and best-execution benchmarks. Whereas the early advocates of crypto were generally anti-IP, seen as fundamentally at odds with a decentralized open-border global financial ecosystem.
That’s quickly changing. When the first official S&P 500 perp launched on Hyperliquid in March, they paid S&P to license it. And while companies like Coinbase, Galaxy and Bullish already own their own crypto indices, they don’t own the IP for tokenized stocks, bonds and commodities. Whoever wins that IP race will get paid every time a tokenized security trades. Firms like sponsor-backed Solactive are natural candidates.
The Former Anarchists Get Fitted for Suits
Longtime crypto fans will recall it was a core tenet of the true believers that crypto represented a new global financial system that would be built atop the ashes of the existing one. TradFi firms were laughable dinosaurs, sadly unaware of the very large Code-as-Law meteor heading straight for them.
They were wrong about the dinosaur part. 2026 M&A will demonstrate the opposite: crypto firms flush with high multiple currency will preempt their peers by acquiring strategic TradFi infrastructure – writing the checks with their own stock because that’s how the accretion works. Growth multiple equity acquiring lower-multiple, profitable infra is the trade.
About the Author
Michael Kraines has spent more than thirty years in financial services as a corporate attorney, investment banker, capital markets technology executive, and digital assets operator.
Be the first to comment