A Nasdaq-listed company cancelled a share placement on September 22, 2026 that an investor had wanted to pay for in RAIN tokens. Four days later the token trades 13 percent below the previous day and 46.4 percent below its all-time high. If you hold RAIN, three things need settling: whether your provider still lists the token at all, what a sale forced by an exchange triggers in tax terms, and how much of the float hangs on a single holder. This piece answers those questions with figures that can be documented, and it names the point where the documentation stops.
What Enlivex terminated on September 22: 66,666,667 shares, payable in RAIN tokens
Enlivex Ltd., a company traded on Nasdaq under the ticker ENLV, announced on September 22, 2026 that it is terminating a securities purchase agreement with the Rain Foundation. The agreement covered a private placement of 66,666,667 of the company’s ordinary shares, which the investor wanted to pay for in RAIN tokens at its own option. Enlivex states that it terminated the agreement in the exercise of its own contractual termination rights. The placement will not be completed, and shareholder approval will no longer be sought for it.
The announcement says nothing further. The company names no motive beyond the termination right, and it gives no indication of what happens to its existing RAIN holding. In the section on forward-looking statements, Enlivex refers generally to risks, expressly including the high volatility of price, trading volume and liquidity of RAIN and other cryptocurrencies.
This reticence matters to you as a reader. A terminated financing is a documented fact. A reason for it is not, as long as nobody names one. Anyone inferring distress from a termination leaves the documented ground, and that is exactly where the mistakes begin.
Why a share placement paid for in tokens is unusual in the first place
In a classic private placement an investor pays money and receives new shares in return. Here the purchase price would have flowed in RAIN tokens. The company would not have received an inflow of cash but a further holding of the same token its balance sheet already depends on. This very concentration is the core of the model that runs under the term digital asset treasury: a listed company holds a crypto-asset as its principal asset, and the share price largely follows that value.
The RAIN price on September 26: 13 percent in a day, 46.4 percent below the all-time high
The market data in this piece comes from CoinGecko, retrieved on September 26, 2026 at 02:51 UTC. RAIN trades there at $0.01044. That is 13.0 percent less than 24 hours earlier, 22.0 percent less than seven days ago, 31.9 percent less than 14 days ago and 40.4 percent less than 30 days ago. The token thus sits 46.4 percent below its all-time high of $0.01946, reached on August 25, 2026.
By market capitalisation RAIN stands at rank 20. Market capitalisation comes to $7.41 billion, trading volume over the past 24 hours to $18.94 million. There are 709.24 billion tokens in circulation against a total supply of 1,142.41 billion.
Whether the price path and the terminated financing are connected cannot be derived from this data. The decline set in before September 22: the gap over 14 and 30 days alone shows a downward move older than the announcement. What is documented is the closeness in time. A cause is not documented by that.
What Rain is technically: a permissionless options protocol on Arbitrum
Rain is a decentralised options protocol on the Ethereum scaling solution Arbitrum. An options protocol is an application through which users can enter into and resell contracts on the future occurrence of an event or a price, without a company acting as counterparty. On Rain, anyone can create markets of their own. Public markets are resolved through an oracle agent, according to the project, while private markets are resolved by whoever created them.
The token itself carries a deflationary model: 2.5 percent of trading volume flows into buying back and burning RAIN, according to the project description. Further development is decided by token holders in a DAO, an organisation whose resolutions are passed through votes on the blockchain. The token sits as a contract on Arbitrum One at the address 0x25118290e6a5f4139381d072181157035864099d.
This classification determines which rules apply to you. A permissionless protocol has no authorisation and no provider that a supervisor could hold to account. What would be a liability question at an authorised exchange is here a question addressed to you.
Worked through: a single Nasdaq holder and 11.2 percent of the float
Enlivex has reported its RAIN holding itself several times. As at June 20, 2026 the company stated 79,568,550,005 tokens worth around $1.14 billion. As at July 18, 2026 the company reported 79,550,593,122 tokens worth around $1.1 billion and a net asset value of $66.16 per ordinary share. We have no more recent holdings report.
We calculated that most recently reported holding against today’s market data. This assessment was carried out by cryptoticker.io itself on September 26, 2026. Method: the token holding reported by Enlivex as at July 18, 2026 was multiplied by the CoinGecko price of September 26, 2026, 02:51 UTC, and set in proportion to the circulating supply shown there. Two objects were examined, the company announcement and the market data set.
At the current price, the last reported holding equals around $830.6 million. Against the $1.1 billion from the July report, that is roughly 24.5 percent less. Measured against the circulating supply of 709.24 billion tokens, the holding equals 11.2 percent of all circulating RAIN.
What we could not verify: whether Enlivex still holds this position unchanged today. The company has published no new holdings figure available to us since July 18, and a change would not be visible from the market data. The 11.2 percent is therefore the order of magnitude of the last report, and not a value as at today.
Trading volume against market capitalisation: why 0.26 percent matters to you
The second figure from our calculation concerns tradability. $18.94 million in daily volume against $7.41 billion in market capitalisation gives a ratio of 0.26 percent. Among the largest crypto-assets this ratio usually runs several times higher.
For you as a holder, a low ratio means one plain practical quantity: the thinner a market is, the more a single larger order moves the price, and the further the price at which you actually sell sits below the one you see on screen. This difference is called slippage. With a thinly traded token it occurs regularly as soon as the order size exceeds the available depth of the order book.
You can check this without specialist knowledge. Look at the order book on your provider’s trading screen and read off how much volume sits in the first price steps below the current level. If your planned sale quantity clearly exceeds that depth, you are selling the price down on yourself. Which providers bring usable order books and dependable fee models at all is shown by our crypto exchange comparison.
Kraken has wound RAIN down: which deadlines expired on June 17 and September 15
For German holders the most important part of this story is older than the Enlivex announcement. The exchange Kraken removed RAIN from trading. According to the exchange’s delisting notice, deposits and trading for RAIN were disabled on June 17, 2026 at 14:00 UTC. Withdrawals were switched off on September 15, 2026 at 14:00 UTC. Remaining balances were liquidated between September 15 and September 25.
In the same notice Kraken points out that the prices achieved in such a liquidation can sit well below recent reference prices and in some cases bring minimal proceeds or none at all, because there is not enough liquidity in the market at the time of execution. We reported the deadline ourselves on August 18, 2026; the details are in our piece on the Kraken withdrawal deadline for RAIN.
The deadline has passed. If your RAIN was sitting there and you did nothing, the question of custody has settled itself and the question of settlement has arisen: there was then a sale you did not trigger, at a price you did not set. What that means in tax terms is in the next section.
Forced sale and holding period: why a liquidation by the exchange counts under Section 23 of the Income Tax Act
In Germany, crypto-assets held privately count as other assets. Gains from selling them fall under private disposals pursuant to Section 23 of the Income Tax Act. The decisive element is the one-year holding period: if more than twelve months lie between acquisition and disposal, a gain stays tax-free. Below that it is taxable, with a threshold of 1,000 euros per calendar year applying to the total of all private disposals.
The decisive point in a forced liquidation runs as follows: tax law does not ask whether you wanted the sale. A disposal is a disposal, even when the exchange executes it because a deadline has expired. If your purchase was less than a year ago, the event is relevant for tax, in the year in which the exchange liquidated.
That works in both directions. A loss from such a sale is likewise relevant within the one-year period and can be offset against gains from other private disposals in the same year, under the rules of Section 23. Once the one-year period has passed this no longer applies, because neither gain nor loss is then captured. Anyone who had a forced sale this year should therefore secure the purchase date, the purchase price and the settlement before access to the account becomes difficult. The easiest way to pull the necessary records is through a portfolio tool; which ones suit German filings is set out in our comparison of crypto tax tools. For the classification of your individual case, a tax adviser remains responsible.
Buying under MiCA: how to check whether your provider still lists the token
Since the European regulation on markets in crypto-assets took effect, a provider offering crypto services in the EU needs an authorisation as a crypto-asset service provider. In Germany, BaFin grants and supervises that authorisation. For you this has an immediate consequence: an authorised provider can and will take tokens out of its offering when it no longer wants to list them, and it has to set you a deadline for that, as Kraken did.
Two things therefore need checking, in this order. First: does your provider still list RAIN at all, and is a deadline already announced? The answer sits on the provider’s status and notice pages, and not in the app overview. Second: is the provider itself authorised? That sits in the public register maintained by the supervisor. Which houses hold the authorisation and how they differ is collected in our overview of regulated crypto exchanges.
With a thinly traded token, do not rely on a trading pair staying in place permanently. A delisting rarely announces itself in the price display. It announces itself in a notice you have to have read.
Self-custody of an Arbitrum token: what the contract address has to do with your wallet
When no authorised provider lists the token any more, self-custody remains. RAIN sits on Arbitrum One, a layer-2 chain above Ethereum. A wallet that supports Ethereum and its layer-2 networks can hold the token, but often only displays it once you add the contract address by hand.
This is exactly where fraudsters come in. Copied contracts with identical names and identical symbols circulate for well-known tokens, and they are worthless. The only reliable check is comparing the full contract address character by character against a source you trust independently, such as the project page or an established data service. A token somebody sends into your wallet unasked is no gift. As a rule it is the beginning of an attempted fraud.
For amounts that would hurt you, the key belongs on a device that is not connected to the network. Which devices manage that and what they cost is set out in our hardware wallet comparison. Bear in mind: with self-custody the counterparty that could help you after a mistake disappears. The price of independence is that a lost key is lost for good.
Options and event markets: what German users have to settle legally and for tax
Between holding a token and using the protocol it depends on lies a legal difference that many overlook. Anyone who buys RAIN and leaves it alone moves within the familiar frame of Section 23. Anyone trading options or event markets on the protocol is doing something else, and the tax classification of such transactions is not the same as with the simple purchase of an asset. Whether a specific transaction has to be treated as a forward transaction within the meaning of Section 20 depends on its structure and belongs in the hands of a tax adviser before you trade, and not afterwards.
On top of that comes a second layer. Markets on which people stake money on the outcome of future events touch gambling law in Germany. Where the line runs between a financial instrument and a betting offer requiring a licence is a question of the individual case, and not one that can be answered from a protocol’s product description. For you that means: settle the legal position before you use such markets.
A permissionless protocol does not take that examination off your hands. It makes it necessary, because nobody else carries it out for you.
Levels up and down: what to measure the next move in RAIN against
At this price level, only marks that emerge from the data itself are any use for orientation. To the downside, the round level of $0.01000 sits immediately below the current price of $0.01044. It is a psychological threshold at which stop orders tend to cluster, and not technical support in the sense of chart analysis. If it is breached, that says nothing about the protocol at first, but it does say something about the order sizes then hitting a thin market.
To the upside, two values are documented: the level of 30 days ago, which sat 40.4 percent above today’s reading, and the all-time high of August 25, 2026 at $0.01946. That is 46.4 percent away. This is expressly not a price forecast. It is the yardstick against which you can judge whether a recovery is a bounce within a downtrend or a reversal.
For context: our earlier report on the price jump in RAIN dates from September 20, 2026 and described an upward move that has since been given back in full. How fast the situation turns with a token of this size can be read off that gap of six days; the assessment at the time is in our piece on the RAIN price jump and the trading routes.
Checking the RAIN token: what to take away
Three steps, in this order, each aimed at turning a news item into a decision.
- Settle access before you think about the price. Check your provider’s notice pages for whether RAIN is still listed there and whether a deadline is running. If nobody you want to use lists it any more, the price question is secondary. Which authorised houses come into question is set out in the overview of regulated crypto exchanges.
- Secure the tax position, especially after a forced sale. Pull the purchase date, the purchase price and the settlement of the sale while you still have access to the account, and hold the one-year period under Section 23 against them. The cleanest way to gather those records is with a tool from our comparison of crypto tax tools.
- Decide on custody before the next deadline runs. If you want to keep the token, move it into a wallet whose keys you control, and compare the contract address character by character. Suitable devices are in the hardware wallet comparison.
And a qualification this piece expressly carries: the terminated financing is documented, the price path is documented, the last reported holding is documented. A causal connection between those three things is not. Anyone asserting it does so without a basis.
(As of September 26, 2026. This article is not investment advice. Prices and fee structures change; check the terms with the provider before you buy.)
Be the first to comment