Midnight (NIGHT) has pulled back from its latest peak but remains more than 75% above its September 25 price, as buyers try to hold onto the advance.
NIGHT’s pullback left it near $0.0409 on October 1, still about 77.5% above its September 25 price of roughly $0.0230. Although sellers trimmed a larger gain, the retreat has so far preserved much of the advance.
The rise coincided with a wider recovery in altcoins, with NIGHT among the tokens highlighted in our review of the broadening rally. For NIGHT, that strength built on a recovery that had started before the latest surge.
How NIGHT broke the pattern of falling highs
NIGHT spent much of the year making lower highs, as sellers stopped each rebound below the previous one. The long descending blue trendline traces that pattern. Crossing above it before the late-September rally was the first indication that buyers were beginning to overcome the pressure that had kept the token falling.
September’s pullbacks then held above the July and August lows, while the latest advance cleared the earlier September highs. Those higher lows and the new higher high strengthened the reversal case: buyers were defending declines sooner and carrying rebounds further.
The speed of the latest rally has nevertheless stretched momentum. The 14-period relative strength index, or RSI, was near 86.6, well above the conventional overbought threshold of 70. Such a reading reflects strong recent gains, but cannot tell traders when the rally will end.
A pullback can therefore occur while the uptrend survives. What would weaken that case is a series of failed rebounds followed by lower lows. The response at support will help show whether buyers are pausing after the surge or losing control of the recovery.
Where buyers could defend the rally
The closest moving average below NIGHT is the 200 SMA, or 200-day simple moving average, near $0.0303. It falls within the $0.030-$0.031 area where price traded repeatedly earlier in the year, making that zone worth watching if the pullback deepens.
Reaching the 200 SMA from $0.0409 would mean a decline of roughly 26%. Even if buyers defended it and kept the broader recovery intact, that would be a substantial loss for someone entering after the surge. The deeper references sit around the rally’s starting point and the rising trendline:
- $0.030-$0.031: 200 SMA
- The 200 SMA near $0.0303 overlaps earlier trading activity.
- $0.023-$0.024: 100 SMA
- The 100 SMA sits near the area where the latest rally began.
- Around $0.0222: 50 SMA
- The 50 SMA provides another reference just below that starting area.
- $0.020-$0.021: rising trendline
- The line connects the recovery’s lows, with its support level rising over time.
If NIGHT tests $0.030–$0.031, closes above it and sustains a rebound, buyers would have evidence that the area is attracting demand. A close below it followed by a failed reclaim would shift attention toward the 100 SMA at $0.023-$0.024. Falling through that second zone would erase most of the gain since September 25.
The 50 SMA and rising trendline sit below it. Losing the trendline and then breaking the preceding swing low would undermine the higher-low structure that supports the recovery. Since the October 1 candle was still open when the chart was captured, a completed daily close and the next rebound would carry more weight than a brief move through support.
What Midnight lets an application keep private
The rally has also brought attention to the technology behind NIGHT. Midnight lets applications verify information without publishing all the underlying data. It uses zero-knowledge proofs to check a claim while keeping the sensitive details behind it private.
An application could, for example, verify that someone is over 21 without revealing their full date of birth. The person provides suitable identity evidence, and the application checks the age requirement. This limits unnecessary disclosure, although the proof still needs reliable identity evidence to establish a meaningful result.
Financial applications could use the same approach to check eligibility while protecting customer information. For NIGHT holders, the commercial relevance depends on whether those services generate demand for the resources needed to run transactions.
How application use connects to NIGHT
Midnight charges transaction fees in DUST, a resource generated over time by registered NIGHT holdings. Transactions consume DUST while the NIGHT remains held. Because DUST is non-transferable and used to pay network fees, generating it should not be confused with earning cash interest.
Application providers can sponsor those fees, allowing users to access a service without buying NIGHT themselves. A September 29 Midnight Messenger developer update described this approach for identity registration on the Preprod testing network, with mobile apps in team beta. The provider arranges transaction capacity on the users’ behalf.
Growth in users could consequently increase demand for that capacity without creating a NIGHT purchase for every new account. How providers obtain and manage DUST will help determine how application activity translates into demand for the token.
That demand also needs to be considered alongside scheduled token releases. Midnight’s distribution guide sets out four 25% instalments, with staggered starts and subsequent 90-day intervals. These releases make allocated tokens available to holders, although selling depends on what recipients choose to do.
Usage data showing recurring demand for DUST would give investors a firmer basis for judging adoption. The Messenger beta shows how fee sponsorship can work; regular application activity would help establish whether that design is creating lasting demand beyond the interest generated by NIGHT’s rally.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Technical levels are approximate and do not guarantee future price movements.
Kosta has reported on cryptocurrency markets and blockchain infrastructure since 2020, bringing over six years of hands-on experience in the crypto industry built through daily tracking of markets, trends, and emerging blockchain developments. Specializing in Bitcoin on-chain analysis, institutional ETF flows, and digital asset price action, his work at Coindoo has been cited by other news agencies and consistently covers market developments with a focus on data-driven reporting across Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and XRP.
Over the years, Kosta has contributed to multiple crypto media outlets in different regions, authoring over 6,000 articles across the sector. His reporting spans cryptocurrency markets and the broader fintech industry, tracking not only price action but also the technological and regulatory forces shaping the ecosystem.
To support his analysis, Kosta actively leverages on-chain data and metrics from leading platforms such as Santiment, Glassnode, and CryptoQuant, enabling deeper, evidence-based market insights. He believes in the power of transparency and the data that underpins the blockchain ecosystem.
His academic background in Marketing Management from Denmark further complements his analytical approach, adding a strong understanding of communication strategy and content positioning to his work.
Be the first to comment